Introduction to waveguide cutoff and modal propagation
A hollow metallic waveguide supports discrete field patterns rather than the TEM wave found in coaxial cable. Each pattern is a mode identified by a family, TE or TM, and two indices. Its cutoff frequency is the boundary between evanescent and propagating behavior. Below cutoff, the field decays exponentially along the guide. Above cutoff, the mode can carry power, although its wavelength and velocity differ from those of an unbounded plane wave.
This calculator handles rectangular and circular cross-sections. Rectangular guides use standing-wave indices across the broad wall a and narrow wall b. Circular guides instead use Bessel-function roots because their boundary is cylindrical. The calculator also allows a uniform dielectric or magnetic filling and can evaluate guide wavelength, phase velocity, group velocity and below-cutoff attenuation at a chosen operating frequency.
Cutoff is fundamentally a boundary-condition result. The conducting walls force particular components of the electric field to vanish at the metal surface, so only field patterns that satisfy those constraints can exist. The transverse pattern determines a fixed transverse wavenumber. At low frequency there is not enough total wavenumber left to create a real axial propagation constant, and the field becomes evanescent. Once frequency rises through the threshold, the axial propagation constant becomes real and power can travel along the guide.
The calculated cutoff should therefore be treated as a modal threshold, not as a complete hardware rating. A real waveguide assembly also includes launches, flanges, bends, twists, irises, windows and manufacturing tolerances. Those details determine return loss, insertion loss, power handling and the degree to which unwanted modes are excited. The calculator is most useful for first-pass design, dimensional checks, education and interpretation of measured behavior.
How to use the waveguide cutoff inputs
Select the cross-section first, then enter internal dimensions in millimetres, centimetres or inches. A rectangular preset such as WR-90 fills the standard aperture automatically. Choose TE or TM and enter the mode indices. Rectangular TE modes permit either index to be zero, but not both; rectangular TM modes require both indices to be at least one. For a circular guide, the second index counts Bessel roots and therefore begins at one.
Relative permittivity εr and relative permeability µr describe a homogeneous material filling the entire aperture. Use 1 for air or vacuum. The optional operating frequency lets the result distinguish propagation from evanescence. It also reveals whether a frequency lies uncomfortably close to cutoff or above the next mode’s threshold.
For a rectangular calculation, broad wall a should normally be the larger internal dimension and narrow wall b the smaller one. The equations still calculate a value if they are reversed, but the familiar mode labels and dominant-mode interpretation then become confusing. For a circular calculation, state whether the entered quantity is a radius or diameter. Confusing those two values changes cutoff by a factor of two, making it one of the most consequential entry errors.
After choosing the geometry, select the field family. TE means the electric field has no longitudinal component, while TM means the magnetic field has no longitudinal component. Enter the indices as whole numbers. If the operating frequency is unknown, leave it blank and use the cutoff and spectrum results alone. If it is known, include it so the calculator can estimate dispersion quantities and identify whether listed modes are propagating.
Press Calculate cutoff frequency to generate the selected cutoff, cutoff wavelength, dominant mode, next distinct threshold and a low-order mode table. The selected mode is highlighted in that spectrum. The Copy button creates a concise text summary, while the CSV button exports the generated spectrum for a spreadsheet or engineering notebook. Reset restores the familiar WR-90, TE10, 10 GHz example.
Use internal aperture dimensions. Outside tube dimensions and flange dimensions do not set cutoff. For example, WR-90 has an internal aperture of 22.86 mm × 10.16 mm. Entering its outside width produces a materially incorrect answer.
Formulas for rectangular and circular waveguide cutoff
For a rectangular guide, separation of the wave equation gives the transverse eigenvalue . At cutoff, the axial propagation constant is zero, giving:
Here c is exactly 299 792 458 m/s. For air-filled TE10, the narrow-wall term is zero, so cutoff depends only on a:
A circular guide of radius r requires Bessel roots. TE modes use roots of the derivative J′m; TM modes use roots of Jm itself:
The dominant circular mode is TE11, whose first derivative root is about 1.84118. The lowest circular TM mode is TM01, with root 2.40483. Because these values are relatively close, circular guide has a narrower natural single-mode interval than a conventional rectangular guide.
Above cutoff, the unbounded-medium wavelength λ0, guide wavelength λg, phase velocity and group velocity are related by:
Phase velocity may exceed the plane-wave velocity without carrying information faster than light. Energy and modulation follow group velocity. Below cutoff, the corresponding axial quantity is an attenuation constant:
The velocity v appearing in these relationships is the plane-wave velocity in the homogeneous filling, not necessarily the vacuum speed of light. Increasing relative permittivity or permeability reduces that velocity and lowers all ideal cutoff frequencies by the same material factor. The equations assume that the material reaches every wall and is uniform along the guide. A dielectric slab, support bead, liquid meniscus or air gap does not satisfy that assumption.
Worked example: WR-90 at 10 GHz
WR-90 has an internal aperture of 22.86 mm × 10.16 mm. For air-filled TE10, m = 1 and n = 0, so the broad-wall dimension alone determines cutoff. Substituting a = 0.02286 m gives approximately 6.557 GHz. At 10 GHz the mode is safely above cutoff, and the guide wavelength is about 39.7 mm rather than the approximately 30.0 mm free-space wavelength.
The next distinct rectangular mode for this aperture is TE20 at about 13.114 GHz. That places 10 GHz inside the single-mode region. The usual WR-90 operating band of 8.2–12.4 GHz leaves margin above the dominant cutoff and below the next-mode threshold.
The operating-to-cutoff ratio in this example is about 1.525. That ratio is high enough to avoid the extreme dispersion immediately above cutoff, yet it remains below the next ideal modal threshold. The calculated phase velocity is greater than the speed of light in air, while group velocity is lower. This does not violate relativity: the crest of a monochromatic phase pattern is not an information-bearing object, and signal energy advances at the group velocity.
If the broad wall were manufactured one percent wider, the TE10 cutoff would be approximately one percent lower because that particular cutoff is inversely proportional to a. The same simple sensitivity does not apply to every higher mode because many depend on both dimensions. This illustrates why internal dimensional tolerances and plating thickness can matter in millimetre-wave hardware.
Worked example: PTFE-filled circular TE11
For a circular guide with a 10 mm internal radius, air-filled TE11 cuts off near 8.785 GHz. A uniform PTFE filling with εr = 2.1 and µr = 1 divides that value by √2.1, producing about 6.06 GHz. The filling shifts every mode by the same factor, so it does not increase the spectrum’s relative single-mode width.
If 10 mm were mistakenly entered as a diameter rather than a radius, the physical radius would be 5 mm and cutoff would double. The radius-basis selector exists to prevent that common ambiguity. In a fabricated component, the designer must also decide whether the quoted diameter is before or after plating, coating or liner installation. The electromagnetic aperture is the final internal opening seen by the fields.
Real PTFE properties vary with grade, frequency, temperature, density and manufacturing history. A nominal relative permittivity may be adequate for an estimate, but a narrowband filter, resonator or precision phase section needs material data appropriate to the actual frequency and process. Loss tangent is not included here, so the calculator predicts the modal threshold and ideal dispersion rather than dielectric insertion loss.
Standard rectangular waveguide reference sizes
The following values provide useful checks. Dimensions are internal apertures, and cutoffs refer to air-filled TE10. Recommended bands are conventional operating ranges rather than mathematical consequences of cutoff alone.
| Size | Internal a × b | TE10 cutoff | Recommended band |
|---|---|---|---|
| WR-284 | 72.14 × 34.04 mm | 2.078 GHz | 2.60–3.95 GHz |
| WR-90 | 22.86 × 10.16 mm | 6.557 GHz | 8.20–12.40 GHz |
| WR-62 | 15.80 × 7.90 mm | 9.488 GHz | 12.40–18.00 GHz |
| WR-28 | 7.112 × 3.556 mm | 21.077 GHz | 26.50–40.00 GHz |
| WR-10 | 2.540 × 1.270 mm | 59.014 GHz | 75–110 GHz |
The WR number historically corresponds approximately to the broad-wall dimension in hundredths of an inch, although modern standards should be consulted for exact tolerances and designations. R-series, WG-series and newer millimetre-wave naming systems can refer to comparable apertures under different regional conventions. A name alone is not enough for precision work; verify the stated internal dimensions.
Recommended bands leave practical room above dominant cutoff and below higher-mode thresholds. They also reflect flange ecosystems, available components, attenuation, power handling and accepted industry practice. A mathematical single-mode interval can therefore be wider than the frequency range in which commercial components are specified. Always use the most restrictive rating among the guide, transitions, windows, bends, loads and instruments in the signal path.
Interpreting cutoff margin and the mode spectrum
A frequency below the selected mode’s cutoff produces evanescent decay. Just above cutoff, group velocity is low, guide wavelength is long and dispersion is strong. In ordinary transmission hardware, designers therefore avoid treating cutoff itself as a usable band edge. A common practical region begins around 1.25 times the dominant cutoff and ends before the next mode can propagate.
The spectrum matters because an overmoded guide can carry several field patterns at once. Bends, steps, launches and imperfect joints can convert power between them, causing ripple, unexpected polarization and unstable return loss. The calculator highlights the selected mode and lists the lowest modes so that the next threshold is visible.
A mode listed as propagating is physically permitted, but that does not mean it carries substantial power. Excitation depends on the symmetry and field distribution of the source. A centered probe or properly designed transition may couple strongly to the desired mode and weakly to another permitted mode. Mechanical asymmetry, misalignment and discontinuities can break that selectivity, which is why overmoded operation remains risky even when the launch initially appears clean.
Conversely, a below-cutoff section can be useful. Short reduced-height or undersized sections appear in filters, attenuators and coupling structures because evanescent fields can tunnel through a finite length. The displayed ideal attenuation rate describes exponential decay for a uniform section; it is not a full two-port insertion-loss prediction. Reflections at both transitions and reactive energy storage also affect the measured response.
The suggested dominant-mode band in the result is a broad heuristic, not a replacement for a standard waveguide band. Its lower boundary provides separation from the strongly dispersive cutoff region. Its upper boundary is only an initial guide because the actual next-mode cutoff depends on aperture aspect ratio. The generated spectrum is the more relevant check for the dimensions entered.
What rectangular and circular mode indices mean
In rectangular guide, m counts half-wave field variations across a, while n counts them across b. TE10 has one variation across the broad wall and none across the narrow wall. For TM modes, either zero index would make the field solution vanish, so TM11 is the lowest permitted rectangular TM mode.
The labels describe transverse field structure, not a simple count of complete sinusoidal wavelengths. A larger index generally raises cutoff because it forces more transverse variation into the same aperture. Changing the corresponding wall dimension changes how tightly that variation is confined. This is why TE20 is sensitive to the broad wall while TE01 is controlled by the narrow wall.
Some rectangular modes are degenerate, meaning different labels have the same cutoff. Degeneracy occurs when the geometry and indices produce the same transverse eigenvalue. A square guide is especially prone to this because swapping the two indices leaves the cutoff unchanged. Degenerate modes can combine in arbitrary orientations, and small imperfections may split their propagation constants or rotate the observed field pattern.
In circular guide, m is the azimuthal order and n selects a radial Bessel root. These indices do not have the same geometric meaning as rectangular indices. Circular TE11, not TE10, is the dominant mode. Many circular modes also occur as two orthogonal angular orientations with equal ideal cutoff, so polarization control and mechanical symmetry become important.
The calculator evaluates a bounded set of low-order circular roots: azimuthal order zero through five and radial root one through four. That range covers common dominant and nearby modes while keeping interactive calculations quick. Very high-order studies, heavily overmoded systems and mode converters should use a dedicated eigenmode tool with a larger basis and detailed geometry.
How aperture dimensions control waveguide cutoff
Waveguide cutoff scales inversely with size. If every transverse dimension is multiplied by two while material properties and mode indices remain unchanged, every ideal cutoff frequency is divided by two. This scale invariance is useful when moving a concept between microwave and millimetre-wave bands. It also explains why high-frequency waveguides become mechanically small and increasingly sensitive to machining, plating and alignment.
For dominant rectangular TE10, only broad-wall dimension a appears in cutoff. Narrow-wall dimension b still matters greatly to characteristic wave impedance, conductor loss, power capacity, higher-mode spacing and mechanical compatibility. It should not be interpreted as irrelevant merely because the TE10 cutoff result does not change when b changes.
The conventional two-to-one rectangular aspect ratio provides a useful balance. It places TE20 and TE01 near the same cutoff, often about twice the dominant TE10 threshold. Different aspect ratios can shift which higher mode appears first. The spectrum table calculates those relationships rather than assuming the aperture follows a conventional ratio.
For circular guide, radius is the only transverse length scale, so all ideal cutoffs vary inversely with radius. A diameter entry is converted to half its value before calculation. Ovality, seams and surface defects break perfect circular symmetry and can separate otherwise degenerate polarizations. Such perturbations are usually small for well-made guide but can become measurable in long precision assemblies.
Dielectric and magnetic filling assumptions
A homogeneous filling changes the wave velocity through the product of relative permittivity and relative permeability. Most ordinary microwave dielectrics have relative permeability close to one, so permittivity dominates. Magnetic materials can have frequency-dependent and complex properties, making a single positive µr an approximation. The calculator accepts positive real values and does not model magnetic or dielectric loss.
Uniform filling means the cross-section contains the same material everywhere and that the material continues uniformly along the region being analysed. A partially filled guide has fields in multiple media and generally requires solving a different eigenvalue problem. Simply averaging permittivities can produce misleading cutoff values because electric energy is not distributed uniformly across the aperture.
Air is commonly approximated with εr = 1 and µr = 1. Atmospheric pressure, humidity and temperature make its refractive index slightly different from unity, but that correction is often negligible compared with mechanical tolerance. Gas-filled scientific systems or precision metrology may require a more accurate refractive index and environmental data.
Material dispersion means εr itself may change with frequency. In that case the cutoff relationship is implicit because the material value used at cutoff should correspond to the cutoff frequency. A frequency-independent nominal value is usually adequate for preliminary work, while broadband or resonant systems should use measured complex material data and a numerical solver.
Guide wavelength, phase velocity and group velocity near cutoff
Guide wavelength is the axial distance over which the field phase repeats. It is longer than the wavelength in the homogeneous filling and becomes extremely long as frequency approaches cutoff from above. Far above cutoff, the guide wavelength approaches the plane-wave wavelength because transverse confinement consumes a smaller fraction of the total wavenumber.
Phase velocity describes the advance of a constant-phase point. It becomes very large near cutoff, but this does not represent superluminal transfer of energy or information. Group velocity describes the movement of a narrowband envelope in the ideal lossless model and approaches zero at cutoff. Their product equals the square of the plane-wave velocity in the filling.
Because group velocity changes with frequency, a modulated signal experiences waveguide dispersion. Different spectral components acquire different phase delays, potentially broadening pulses or changing modulation phase. The effect is strongest close to cutoff and weaker farther into the passband. Long waveguide runs, wide bandwidths and precision timing applications therefore need more than a simple pass-or-fail cutoff check.
Actual group delay also includes conductor and dielectric loss, junction reactance, flange mismatch and component dispersion. The calculator isolates the ideal uniform-guide contribution. It is appropriate for understanding trends and estimating whether a selected operating point is too close to cutoff, but a network analyser or full-wave model is preferred for final group-delay verification.
Choosing a practical single-mode operating range
Single-mode operation requires the desired dominant mode to be above cutoff while every competing mode remains below its own threshold. The exact mathematical interval begins at the dominant cutoff and ends at the next distinct cutoff. Practical systems use a narrower interval to provide margin for loss, dispersion, tolerances and discontinuities.
The lower edge is often set well above cutoff because conductor attenuation rises and impedance changes rapidly near the threshold. The upper edge is kept below the next mode because even a weakly excited higher mode can interfere with the dominant field. Its different propagation constant creates frequency-dependent beating, so a small amount of conversion may cause substantial ripple after a long run.
A system can also be limited by components before the straight guide becomes overmoded. Coaxial transitions, bends, rotary joints, windows, horns and detectors each have their own specified bands. A complete design should compare all component ratings and include manufacturing variation. The safest operating range is the intersection of those constraints.
When overmoded operation is intentional, cutoff calculations remain valuable because they identify which modes are available. Large astronomical feeds, high-power transmission lines and specialized mode converters may deliberately support many modes. Such designs require control of modal content, not merely knowledge that propagation is possible.
Comparing calculated cutoff with measurements
Cutoff can be inferred from transmission measurements, but the observed transition is not infinitely sharp. A finite test section has reflections at its launches, conductor loss and possible leakage. Below-cutoff tunnelling through a short section can create measurable transmission, while mismatch near cutoff can obscure the ideal threshold. Longer uniform sections usually show the evanescent decay more clearly.
A vector network analyser measures scattering parameters rather than cutoff directly. Engineers may examine insertion loss, phase, group delay or the onset of a stable propagating response. Calibration reference planes should be placed carefully so adapters do not dominate the result. Time-domain gating can sometimes separate fixture reflections from the guide section.
If measurement and calculation disagree, first verify internal dimensions, units, radius-versus-diameter selection and the chosen mode. Then examine material properties, plating thickness, seams, corner radii and launch symmetry. A disagreement can also indicate that the observed feature belongs to a different mode or a cavity resonance rather than the expected cutoff.
Machining reports often quote dimensions before plating. Conductive plating reduces the final aperture, raising cutoff slightly. At lower microwave frequencies the difference may be minor, but in small millimetre-wave guide a few micrometres can be significant. Surface roughness mainly affects attenuation, although extreme roughness or thick coatings can also perturb effective geometry.
Where waveguide cutoff calculations are used
Cutoff calculations guide the selection of transmission line for radar, satellite communication, radio astronomy, laboratory instrumentation, industrial heating and accelerator systems. Standard rectangular guide is common when low loss, shielding and high power handling matter. Circular guide is useful in rotating joints, antenna feeds and systems that exploit polarization or special modal symmetry.
Waveguide filters use sections and discontinuities whose behavior is closely connected to modal cutoff. Horn antennas begin as guided structures before gradually transforming the field into a radiated wave. Cavity resonators can be understood as bounded waveguide regions, although their resonance frequencies also depend on longitudinal boundary conditions. The cutoff calculator does not replace those component models, but it supplies the transverse modal foundation.
Below-cutoff tubes are also used as electromagnetic feedthroughs and shielding structures. A conducting opening can strongly attenuate frequencies below its dominant cutoff when it is sufficiently long. Aperture shape, length, wall conductivity and joints determine actual shielding effectiveness, so the displayed decay estimate is only part of that design.
In education, comparing TE and TM spectra helps connect Maxwell’s equations with practical microwave hardware. Changing one dimension reveals which index is associated with each wall. Switching between rectangular and circular geometry demonstrates why Cartesian standing waves lead to simple integer terms while cylindrical boundaries lead to Bessel roots.
Accuracy checks before relying on a waveguide result
A reliable calculation begins with dimensional provenance. Confirm that dimensions describe the finished internal aperture, identify the unit, and determine whether a circular specification gives radius or diameter. Check that the broad and narrow rectangular walls are assigned consistently. For a standard designation, compare the entered values with the applicable edition of the mechanical standard.
Next, verify modal notation. Rectangular TE00 does not exist, and rectangular TM modes require both indices to be nonzero. Circular notation follows Bessel roots and should not be interpreted as rectangular half-wave counts. If a published document uses a different convention, confirm how its indices and polarization labels are defined.
Finally, assess whether the ideal assumptions match the physical device. Uniform empty metal guide is a good fit. Ridged, corrugated, dielectric-loaded, curved, tapered or substrate-integrated structures require specialized equations or numerical eigenmode analysis. Even when the ideal model is appropriate, reserve operating margin and verify critical assemblies by simulation or measurement.
Limitations of this ideal waveguide model
The calculation assumes a straight, uniform guide with perfectly conducting walls and a homogeneous, lossless filling. It does not model conductor loss, surface roughness, corner radius, bends, flanges, ridges, corrugations or partial dielectric loading. Those effects may require an electromagnetic eigenmode solver or measurement. Cutoff also says whether a mode can propagate, not whether a particular launch excites it.
The below-cutoff attenuation result is the ideal field-decay rate associated with the axial propagation constant. It excludes transition mismatch and does not predict total shielding effectiveness or insertion loss through a finite assembly. Above cutoff, calculated phase and group velocities likewise omit frequency-dependent conductor and dielectric loss.
The circular calculation obtains low-order Bessel roots numerically and limits the accepted indices to the range shown by the input guidance. The rectangular spectrum is also intentionally limited to low-order indices for an understandable result table. These limits are suitable for identifying dominant and nearby modes, not for cataloguing every mode in a highly overmoded guide.
Recommended operating margins are engineering guidance rather than universal requirements. High-power, pulse, cryogenic, vacuum, metrology and safety-critical systems can impose additional constraints. Confirm critical designs against the relevant mechanical standard, material data, electromagnetic simulation and calibrated network-analyser measurements.
Waveguide cutoff questions and concise answers
Why does TE10 ignore the narrow wall?
Its narrow-wall index is zero, so the n/b contribution vanishes. The narrow wall still affects other modes, impedance, attenuation and power handling.
Can a rectangular equation be used for round pipe?
No. Cylindrical boundary conditions lead to Bessel roots, so treating a diameter as rectangular width gives the wrong cutoff.
Does dielectric filling always lower cutoff?
For positive εr and µr, a uniform filling lowers cutoff by the square root of their product. A partial filling requires a different field solution.
Why is operation exactly at cutoff undesirable?
Group velocity approaches zero and dispersion becomes extreme. Real conductor attenuation and sensitivity to tolerances also rise near the threshold.
Is every mode above cutoff automatically excited?
No. A mode can propagate only if it is above cutoff, but actual amplitude depends on launch geometry, symmetry and discontinuities.
Why can phase velocity exceed the speed of light?
Phase velocity tracks a constant-phase point rather than information or energy. Signal energy follows group velocity in this ideal model.
Should plating thickness be included in the dimensions?
Yes. Use the finished internal aperture after plating or coating because that is the boundary encountered by the electromagnetic field.
What happens if two modes have the same cutoff?
They are degenerate in the ideal geometry. Small asymmetries can split or mix them, and a launch may excite one orientation more strongly than another.
Sources for waveguide equations and dimensions
The equations follow standard microwave engineering treatments, including D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, and W. C. Chew’s Purdue ECE 604 waveguide notes. Standard rectangular dimensions are consistent with IEC 60153-2, MIL-DTL-85 and IEEE Std 1785.1. The speed of light is the exact SI value 299 792 458 m/s.
Published standards should be consulted directly when purchasing, machining or certifying hardware because flange type, tolerance class and frequency recommendations can vary. Reference values on this page are intended for calculation checks and engineering orientation, not as a substitute for controlled mechanical drawings.
